Relevant links:
We combined the observation periods when the particular interesting chip was fully covered by dark Moon, and excluded several periods of background flares. Table 1 lists the dark Moon observations (all archived) included in the final datasets (available upon request):
Table 1. Dark Moon exposures
------------------------------------------- date obsid Clean exposures, s I2 I3 S2 S3 ------------------------------------------- 2001-7-26 2469 2930 2811 2001-7-26 2487 1921 2982 2001-7-26 2488 2324 2748 2001-7-26 2489 2736 2736 2001-7-26 2490 2739 978 2001-7-26 2493 2573 950 2001-9-22 2468 3157 3157 1219 519 2001-9-22 3368 2223 2223 2001-9-22 3370 4772 4772 2001-9-22 3371 3995 3995 ------------------------------------------- total 14147 14147 16442 13724 ------------------------------------------- |
The dark Moon spectrum for S3 was compared to the Event Histogram Mode data (a mode with HRC-I is in the focal plane and ACIS stowed inside the detector housing, transmitting limited information, see this memo by B. Biller). At that SIM position, ACIS is not exposed to sky X-rays but the particle background is expected to be the same. As Fig. 1 shows (see also figures in B. Biller's memo), the dark Moon and the EHM spectra are in good agreement, except for the expected residual line emission from the external calibration source.
Fig. 1.   Spectra of dark Moon (black) and Event Histogram Mode (red) for chip S3. Energy scale is approximate (spectra are extracted in PHA channels); gain correction, VF mode or bad pixel cleaning were not applied in order for the spectra to be directly comparable. |
An example of using the dark Moon S3 background for science analysis is
given in our CXB paper
(astro-ph/0209441). However, as shown in Wargelin et al.
(astro-ph/0402247), there is a small time-variable soft component in the
dark Moon data for chips I2 and I3, so it shouldn't be used for detector
background modeling. For all practical purposes, the dark Moon background
is superseded by ACIS-stowed data described below.
The above EHM - dark Moon comparison strongly suggests that particle background inside the detector housing is the same as in the focal position. With that in mind, starting from 2002, we are performing calibration measurements in a stowed position (moving ACIS further away from the external calibration source than in the HRC-I position, in order to avoid the residual line illumination seen in Fig. 1). ACIS runs in the normal imaging VF mode (as opposed to EHM) so that all the usual filtering and gain correction can be applied. In addition to the normal event grades, flight grade 66 was transmitted for experimental work by the ACIS team; it can be removed by applying the usual ASCA grade filter. Chips I0, I2, I3, S1, S2, S3 were on. The four I chips are sufficiently similar so that after some manipulations, I0 data can be used as a substitute for chip I1, as discussed in in this memo. The usual canned background event file which combines these observations (and includes fake I1 events) can be found in this directory (see the accompanying README file).
As of summer 2006, 7 observations were performed:
Table 2. ACIS-stowed exposures
--------------------------- date obsid exp, ks --------------------------- 2002-08-06 4286 9 2002-09-03 62850 53 2003-05-04 62848 48 2003-12-08 62846 46 2004-11-04 62836 46 2005-06-10 62831 47 2005-11-13 62824 47 2006-06-01 62823 45 --------------------------- combined good 333 --------------------------- |
Figure 2 below shows background spectra from different chips from the first long exposure (obsid 62850). VF mode cleaning is applied. Spectra from chips I0, I2, I3 are similar (so they are shown together), chip S2 has a slightly higher background than the I chips. Chip S1 has a higher background, especially at E>5 keV, then the other BI chip S3.
Fig. 2.   Average of chips I023 (red), chip S2 (black), S3 (green) and S1 (blue), for the 2002 exposure. |
Figures 3, 4 and 5 below compare the ACIS-stowed spectra (Sep 2002 piece, obsid 62850) with the dark Moon observations of 2001, after a small renormalization by the ratio of the high-energy fluxes (in the 2500-3000 ADU interval or 9.5-12 keV energy interval, as recommended in our 2002 CXB paper and 2005 CXB paper):
Fig. 3.   Chip S3, ACIS stowed (black; obsid 62850) compared to dark Moon (red). |
Fig. 4.   Chip S2, ACIS stowed (black; obsid 62850) compared to dark Moon (red). |
Fig. 5.   Chips I23, ACIS stowed (black; obsid 62850) compared to dark Moon (red). The Moon exhibits a significant excess at 0.6-0.9 keV. |
The S3 and S2 dark Moon and stowed spectra are in good
agreement. However, the I23 spectra of the Moon show a significant excess
between 0.6-1 keV. As seen in Table 1, the I23 Moon
spectra are obtained in September 2001, while almost all the S3 and S2 Moon
data are obtained in July 2001. This time-variable excess has sky origin
and is discussed in Wargelin
et al. (2004).
The two figures below compare the ACIS-stowed background from chips I023 (Sep 02, obsid 62850) and the sky background from empty fields with most point sources excluded. Again, a small renormalization was applied using the ratio of fluxes in the 2500-3000 ADU (10-12 keV) interval. Fig. 6 shows a comparison with an observation from the same time period (Aug 2002), and Fig. 7, with the long composite background dataset for year 2001. Both sky background spectra correspond to regions of low Galactic soft X-ray brightness.
Fig. 6.   Chips I023, ACIS stowed (obsid 62850, black) compared to a contemporary blank sky observation (obsid 4357, red) with point sources removed. VF mode cleaning is not applied; the difference at E<2 keV is the diffuse sky background. |
Fig. 7.   Chips I023, ACIS stowed (obsid 62850, black) compared to the composite blank-sky background from 2001 (red) with point sources removed. VF cleaning is applied. |
At E>2 keV where particle background is dominant, the two sky
background spectra are indistinguishable (figure not shown). In addition, as
shown below in Sec. 2.3, there has been no change of
the spectral shape of the detector background during 2002-2004. Thus, the
2002-2004 ACIS-stowed background can be used in the analysis of the 2001
science observations (and probably -120C data from 2000 as well).
Figures below compare spectra from four long exposures (Table 2), after a renormalization to match their 9-12 kev rates. The three 2002-2003 exposures have very similar high-energy rates, while the Nov 2004 exposure has a 1.3 times higher rate, in line with the observed background increase during 2004. After the renormalization, all spectra, including the latter one, are remarkably similar; across the whole energy range the differences are within the statistical scatter or within +-5% from the average almost everywhere. The 4 exposures are combined into a 189 ks dataset which can be found here.
Fig. 8.   Comparison of May 02 (black), Sep 02 (red), Dec 03 (green), and Nov 04 (blue) ACIS-stowed spectra after the renormalization by 9-12 keV rates. Upper pannel shows FI chips (0236), lower panel shows S3. VF cleaning and time-dependent gain correction are applied. |
Fig. 9.   Ratios of rates in several energy bands to 9.5-12 keV, for dark Moon and the 5 pieces of the stowed dataset, for I chips (note that moon I23 data are compared to I023 for stowed). The lower points are the 9.5-12 keV rates. Pairs of lines show +-2% around the mean for the stowed data. |
Table 3. Ratios of moon to stowed normalized rates
----------------------------- chips band moon/stowed ----------------------------- I23 1-2 keV 0.97+-0.05 S2 1-2 keV 0.97+-0.06 S3 1-2 keV 1.01+-0.04 I23 2-7 keV 1.01+-0.03 S2 2-7 keV 0.99+-0.04 S3 2-7 keV 1.04+-0.03 ----------------------------- |