Summary
During a COMM pass on 2001:126 the background
level(Figure 1) in ACA images was observed to be anomalously high for a period
of about 100 seconds. Near the end of this interval two of the five
guide stars were lost for 30-40 seconds as the star flux was overwhelmed
by the high background. ACA telemetry for nearly the entire mission has
now been examined to search for other similar events and to attempt to
determine the cause. Approximately 17 high background events have
occurred, most of them (13) since 2001:126. The most severe occurred on
2001:185, when five out of eight guide stars were lost for over 60
seconds. As yet there is no clear explanation for these anomalies. This
report presents the following:
- Method for extracting high background events
- Characterization of high background events
- Catalog of anomalous high background events
- Fault tree (courtesy RAC)
- Discussion and comments
Method for extracting high background events
The list of high background events for the mission was generated in the
following way:
- Download all ACA Level-0 telemetry (i.e. ACA image telemetry)
within the time period 1999-09-27 to 2001-07-31, one day at a time
- Extract relevant items within the ACA L0 telemetry such as average
background, slot, and image status bits. These were highly compressed
by storing only transitions, such as when a status bit flips or the
background changes by more than 10 DN. Without this compression the
data volume would be too great.
- A high background event is then defined by the following criteria:
- An initial threshold crossing where the background in one slot is
greater than 200 DN for one readout
- Within the time interval (-100 : +300) seconds relative to the
threshold crossing, calculate the total "slot-seconds" in which background >
100 DN, summing over all slots tracking stars or fids.
- If this summed high background duration is greater than 20
seconds, flag a high background event and produce a plot.
All such high background events for
1999, 2000, and
2001 are
available in postscript form. In some cases (such as the Venus
observation) numerous plots are associated with one particular
observation.
Characterization of high background events
The majority of high background events defined this way fall into
three categories (see below for an explanation of the plots):
- Displaced star (Figure 2), due to ionizing
radiation, in which the star is in the "Lost, attempting to re-acquire"
state for up to 120 seconds. During this time the star is offset by
several pixels from the readout window center, thus causing the high
background value. It is not immediately clear why the ACA fails to
reacquire the star, nor why the OBC does not issue a new search command
for the star. Hopefully Ball and TRW/FOT can shed light on these
questions.
- Bombardment by ionizing radiation
(Figure 3)
during perigee causing displaced star and numerous short loss-of-track
events
- Anomalous high background (Figure
1) in
which the star remains in solid lock at the window center, but the
background appears to rapidly flicker up and down. The event shown
here is the prototype high background event.
In addition, two special cases were picked up in this processing:
Catalog of anomalous high background events
Postscript plots showing the background rate and various status bits for
periods of anomalous high background are available for 1999, 2000, and
2001,. The same plots are available as GIF
files in the table below. In each plot, the horizontal axis shows time
in seconds, and vertical shows the background in DNs as reported by the
ACA in image telemetry. When the background trace is black, the star/fid
is being tracked. When it is red, the star/fid is in the "Lost,
attempting to re-acquire" or "Idle" state. In addition, a color "strip
chart" at the top of each plot indicates when ACA status bits are set.
The bits which are plotted are High Background (red), Ionizing Radiation
(black), Defective Pixel (green), Saturated Pixel (blue), and Multiple
Stars (Magenta).
The table below shows details for each high background event. The
final column shows the number of stars in which tracking was lost.
Date Obsid High time RA Dec Roll # LOT
----------------- ----- --------- -------- ------- ------ -----
1999:310:02:31:14 400 32.8000 185.7445 15.8163 49.12 0
2000:052:19:30:49 344 22.5500 40.6514 -0.0028 281.64 0
2000:188:18:15:39 Perig 22.5500 334.1500 56.5500 136.47 0
2000:331:05:45:58 Perig 55.3500 208.5200 69.3800 31.25 0
2001:126:13:08:46 Perig 660.098 280.0000 25.0000 121.19 1
2001:126:22:17:36 Perig 344.400 232.0000 18.0000 166.64 3
2001:170:02:42:56 977 38.9500 271.1116 -24.3781 80.36 0
2001:170:04:49:06 " 32.8000 " " " 0
2001:170:06:05:36 2264 32.8000 311.8162 -36.4910 83.43 0
2001:176:19:12:16 Perig 65.6000 350.0000 30.0000 117.35 2
2001:182:10:27:16 Perig 399.750 295.0000 -30.0000 65.32 3
2001:182:10:32:26 " 153.750 " " " 3
2001:182:11:16:56 " 47.1500 " " " 2
2001:185:02:23:06 Perig 299.300 324.0000 -46.0000 68.94 5
2001:200:22:57:16 Perig 24.6000 289.0000 -37.0000 328.23 0
2001:200:23:40:56 " 22.5500 " " " 0
2001:202:22:01:46 2144 305.450 265.9912 27.9049 219.19 0
Fault tree
Rob Cameron has created the following fault tree:
Diagnostic tests for the ACA high background fault tree:
-
A: Digital Electronics: not a likely cause, since the
digital electronics processing of ACA data is common
to all images, and the high background only affects
some images.
-
B: Saturation effects:While saturation effects can occur in the analog
electronics common to all 4 CCD quadrants, Ball
Aerospace has stated that these effects only persist
for short amounts of time, i.e. the sampling and
digitization of 1 or 2 unsaturated pixels may be
affected by the immediately previous sampling and
digitization of saturated pixels. Since high background
events can affect multiple images over several readouts,
analog electronics saturation is unlikely to be the
cause.
-
C: Direct Light: test for Sun, Earth, Moon, Planets in the
ACA field of view at the time of high background. Of
the planets, only Venus and perhaps Jupiter would be
capable of affecting the background measurement in
several image slots across different quadrants.
Some satellites might be bright enough to saturate
the ACA, but would presumably have small angular
offsets from the Earth.
-
D: Scattered light: correlate episodes of high background
against (theta,phi) coordinates relative to the ACA line
of sight, to try to identify scattering paths. Also
correlate episodes of high background against angular
sizes (i.e. distances to) Earth and Moon. Also correlate
episodes of high background against times of firing of
MUPS thrusters, in case light can be scattered into ACA
by MUPS exhaust plumes.
Discussion and comments
-
To date, none of the high background events have resulted in an
anomalous transition out of NPM because of lost guide stars.
Nevertheless, several instances have come uncomfortably close. Until
we gain a more complete understanding of the root cause, it is
important to schedule as many guide stars as possible during
perigee.
- Most of the high background events (and all of the severe ones)
occurred during perigee. This might be due to increased ionizing
radiation, or perhaps scattered light from the relatively large
Earth. Carrying out the correlation suggested in path D of the fault
tree is an important next step to the investigation.
- Most of the high background events have occurred within the last
six months. This might indicate some sort of degradation. Is it
possible the particle radiation environment (during perigee) is worse
now than in most of 2000?
- One possible diagnostic measure would be to track all guide
stars using 8x8 readout windows during perigee passage. This would
have no impact on spacecraft control nor CXC processing, but would
provide important diagnostic ACA telemetry.
- The similar signature of the Venus observation background to
several of the anomalous high background events could be an important
clue.
- A monitoring system to catch high background events should be
put in place. This can be done with slight modifications to the
existing software used to prepare this report.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Aspect Information main page
Comments or questions: Tom Aldcroft
Last modified:05/13/02