On 2002-Dec-4, an ACA dark current calibration was performed. This consisted
of 5 pointings at slightly offset (2 arcmin) attitudes. At each pointing, two
full frame readouts were performed, one with a 5 second integration and one
with 10 seconds. This gave a total of 10 full frame readouts. For a given
integration time, the 5 images were median filtered on a pixel-by-pixel basis
to remove star images. Then the 5-second median-filtered image was subtracted
from the 10-second median-filtered image to remove dark current accumulation
during the readout period. This is important as it takes approximately 8
seconds to read out a CCD quadrant. Finally, the dark current image was
converted from counts/integration to electrons per second (e-/s).
Comparison to previous calibrations
Previous calibrations have been done on 1999-Aug-11 (during Orbital Activation
and Checkout (OAC) with the SSD closed), 2000-Nov-21 (2000:326),
2001-Mar-01 (2001:060), 2002-Feb-26 (2002:057), 2002-May-17
(2002:137), and 2002-Aug-25 (2002:237). In the following plots we
compare the 2002-Dec-4 (2002:338) data to the previous datasets.
Basic statistics
The table below gives a summary of the statistical properties of the
pixel dark current values. The 'Peak' is calculated by fitting a 2nd order
polynomial to the histogram values within 5 e-/sec of the median, and then
quoting the peak of the fitted polynomial. The 'Mean near peak' is represents
the mean for pixels with a dark current within 5 e-/sec of the median.
|
1999-Aug-11 |
2000-Nov-20 |
2001-Mar-01 |
2002-Feb-26 |
2002-May-17 |
2002-Aug-25 |
2002-Dec-04 |
Mean (e-/s) |
11.9 |
22.2 |
23.9 |
29.2 |
29.8 |
31.0 |
31.7 |
Peak (e-/s) |
10.3 |
11.5 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.2 |
11.9 |
11.9 |
Mean near peak (e-/s) |
10.2 |
11.8 |
12.8 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
N > 100 e-/s |
3495 |
34346 |
37381 |
56671 |
59754 |
64023 |
66850 |
N > 3000 e-/s |
3 |
10 |
13 |
19 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
The statistics above show that there has been little change in the peak
dark current between OAC and the present time. The incidence of "warm"
( > 100 e-/sec) and "hot" pixels (> 3000 e-/sec) appears to be
increasing fairly linearly since launch. Hot pixels are flagged as bad
in the star selection process. A plot of the fraction of pixels
which are warm versus time is shown below.
Differential histogram
The plot below shows the differential distribution of dark current
values, in number of pixels per 1.0 e-/sec bin. The factor of 10
increase in warm pixels since OAC is evident in the tail above ~30
e-/sec.
The graph below
shows the same data, plotted on a linear scale near zero. There is a
substantial non-gaussian tail of negative dark current values. It is
not clear if this is real or a processing artifact. The OAC dark
calibration shows only a gaussian tail consistent with electronic
read-out noise.
Cumulative histogram
Below, the cumulative histogram is shown, indicating the
fraction of pixels with dark current greater than a given
value.
Implications
The rate of increase of warm pixels is about 20000 per year, or 2.0% of
the focal plane per year. This is probably an upper limit to the rate, since
we have been going through the Solar max. At this rate, there should no problems with
ground aspect determination nor on-board star acquisition in the next 2-3
years. However, in the 5-10 year time frame, warm pixels could make up 10-20%
of the CCD focal plane. With sufficient operational effort, dark current maps
will allow subtraction of warm pixels and hence high-quality ground aspect
solutions. A bigger concern is on-board acquisition of faint stars in the
presence of many warm pixels. The magnitude of this potential problem
is difficult to determine, since it depends on details of the ACA
search/acquisition algorithm. A simulation of this algorithm is likely
the best way to address this issue.
Brett Unks
Last modified:
12/27/13