More EPHIN Rates v Sensor Temperature (5EPHINT)

As we continue to relax the Mission Planning Guideline that covers the EPHIN Thermal Limit, we need to trend the EPHIN performance to monitor for unexpected changes in performance. The plots here show the trends observed during the period from 2011-07-17 to 2012-09-01. During this interval the TEPHIN planning limit started at 132 degF, was raised to 135 degF on 2011-09-15, and raised to 138 degF on 2012-06-14. This interval contains extended time spent at Normal-Sun from the CTU TLM-Processor reset on 2011-10-26 and the Safe-Mode on 2012-05-29.

EPHIN data were selected for times outside the rad-zone, during the nominally scheduled time with RadMon enabled. Data from solar events have not been excluded.

EPHIN E150 Coincidence Rate

The E150 rate shows more of the anomalous behavior first observed during the Normal-Sun time of the CTU TLM-Processor reset. This anomalous behavior led to halting the use of the E150 channel for safing within RadMon.

EPHIN E150 rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 1: EPHIN E150 coincidence channel rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature The sensor temperature values have a small, uniformly-distributed random valued added for display purposes.

E1300 Rate

The E1300 rates show drops associated with higher EPHIN sensor temperatures. The decrease in rate with higher temperature is due to a decrease in detector C sensitivity as the temperature increases. There is no rate increase in conjunction with the detector C rate increase for temperatures above ~55.5 degC since the signals are not in coincidence with those from other detectors.

E1300 rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 2: EPHIN E1300 coincidence channel rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.

Detector B0 (Center Segment)

The detector B0 rate increases are similar to the increases in the E150 rate as expected given that the B0 signal is the dominant component of the E150 coincidence channel. The anomalous rates in the B0 detector are what create the anomalous E150 rates.

Detector B0 rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 3: EPHIN detector B0 rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.

Detector C

The detector C rate decreases with increasing sensor temperature above roughly 43 degrees C. This behavior is the same as observed prior to setting detector A failure-mode on. The decrease in rate implies a decreased sensitivity to particles and is due to a lower voltage across the detector. The upturn in the rate above 55.5 degC (similar to detector B0) is likely due to leakage current.
Detector C rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 4: EPHIN detector C rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.

Detector D

The detector D rate decreases with increasing sensor temperature above roughly 50 degrees C, somewhat higher than detector C. As with detector C, the decrease in rates implies a decreased sensitivity to particles. The higher temperature of the on-set of the decrease is consistent with the different detector thickness
Detector D rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 4: EPHIN detector D rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.

Detector E

The detector E rate decreases with increasing sensor temperature above roughly 50 degrees C, similar to detector D. As with detectors C and D, the decrease in rates implies a decreased sensitivity to particles.
Detector E rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 4: EPHIN detector E rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.

Detector F

The detector F rate shows an increase as the rate exceeds roughly 53 degrees C. This may be due to increasing noise that would be reflected in a higher leakage current. Unfortunately, the ceiling on the telemetry reading for the leakage current has been reached at 48 degrees C.
Detector F rate vs 5EPHINT
Figure 4: EPHIN detector F rate vs EPHIN sensor temperature, similar to figure 1.
Mike Juda
Last modified: Mon Sep 10 16:04:02 EDT 2012