Simultaneously Fitting Two Data Sets
Sherpa Threads (CIAO 4.15 Sherpa)
Overview
Synopsis:
The Sherpa syntax easily allows the modeling of multiple, independent data sets. In this example, we have a source observed on two different occasions. If we assume that the source is constant, then the only change will be in the instrument response. We account for this by defining each spectrum independently and fitting with the same model. This allows us to increase the significance of our fit, without making assumptions inherent in the process of averaging spectra and responses.
This thread may also be used to fit source and background data which are independently grouped. Note that the "standard method" of doing this is described in the Simultaneously Fitting Source and Background Spectra thread.
While the sample data files used in this thread are available as sherpa.tar.gz, note also that they are generated with the Extract ACIS Spectra and Response Files for Pointlike Sources thread.
Last Update: 5 Dec 2022 - reviewed for CIAO 4.15, screen output updated; typos fixed.
Contents
- Statistical Issues: Background Subtraction
- Reading FITS Data
- Defining Instrument Responses
- Defining Source Models
- Fitting the Data
- Link Parameters and Fit Again
- Scripting It
- History
- Images
Statistical Issues: Background Subtraction
A typical dataset may contain multiple spectra, one of which contains contributions from the source and the background, and one or more which contain background counts alone. (The background itself may contain contributions from the cosmic X-ray background, the particle background, and so on, but we ignore this complication.)
The proper way to treat background data is to model them. However, many X-ray astronomers subtract background data from the raw data.
Why should one not subtract background?
- It reduces the amount of statistical information in the analysis—the final fit parameter values will be a less accurate estimate of the true values.
- The background-subtracted data are not Poisson-distributed; one cannot fit them with the Poisson likelihood or the Cash statistic, even in the low-counts limit. For example, subtracting a background can give negative counts; this is definitely not Poissonian!
- Fluctuations, particularly in the vicinity of localized features, can adversely affect analysis.
Reading FITS Data
Simultaneous fitting is identical to the basic method of fitting data, except for the specification of the data set ID. Most Sherpa commands have the option of specifying the ID of the data set on which to invoke the command. By default, this number is assumed to be 1; the ID is assigned when the data are loaded into Sherpa.
The spectral data from the two observations of the source are stored in the FITS files pi2278.fits and pi2286.fits. Data Set pi2278.fits is input with the load_pha() command and given ID "1":
sherpa> load_pha(1, "pi2278.fits") statistical errors were found in file 'pi2278.fits' but not used; to use them, re-read with use_errors=True
The second data set is loaded similarly, but is given ID "2":
sherpa> load_pha(2, "pi2286.fits") statistical errors were found in file 'pi2286.fits' but not used; to use them, re-read with use_errors=True
Defining Instrument Responses
Sherpa will automatically read in any instrument response files that are defined in the header of the spectrum (keywords RESPFILE and ANCRFILE).
In this example, the response files were not defined, so we load them with load_arf() and load_rmf(). The data set ID of the corresponding PI file is given in each command:
and
With the responses loaded (so that Sherpa can convert between channel values and energy) we can display the data in physically-meaningful units (Figure 1):
sherpa> plot_data(1) sherpa> plot_data(2, marker='s', markersize=3, overplot=True)
Figure 1: The two spectra
Defining Source Models
We want to model each of the spectra with an absorbed power-law, so a power-law component (powlaw1d, called pl1) and an absorbing component (xsphabs, called abs1) are defined. The same model expression is assigned to each data set:
sherpa> set_source(1, xsphabs.abs1 * powlaw1d.pl1) sherpa> set_source(2, abs1 * pl1)
Data above 5.5 keV is ignored in both data sets to cut out energies with no data. While this is not strictly necessary for this data, it does produce a nicer plot. Ignoring the higher energies may be especially useful for ACIS-S data, where the high-energy background is stronger.
The comma after the value indicates an open range, i.e. everything above "5.5" [keV] will be ignored:
sherpa> ignore(5.5,) dataset 1: 0:10.001 -> 0:4.2778 Energy (keV) dataset 2: 0:10.001 -> 0:4.5114 Energy (keV)
We can use the Sherpa guess command to guess the initial parameter values and ranges for the power-law model component. To have Sherpa automatically query for the initial parameter values when a model is established, set paramprompt(True) (it is False by default).
sherpa> guess(pl1) sherpa> show_model() Model: 1 apply_rmf(apply_arf((11619.081430486 * (xsphabs.abs1 * powlaw1d.pl1)))) Param Type Value Min Max Units ----- ---- ----- --- --- ----- abs1.nH thawed 1 0 100000 10^22 atoms / cm^2 pl1.gamma thawed 1 -10 10 pl1.ref frozen 1 -3.40282e+38 3.40282e+38 pl1.ampl thawed 6.4442e-06 6.4442e-09 0.0064442 Model: 2 apply_rmf(apply_arf((11619.081410727 * (xsphabs.abs1 * powlaw1d.pl1)))) Param Type Value Min Max Units ----- ---- ----- --- --- ----- abs1.nH thawed 1 0 100000 10^22 atoms / cm^2 pl1.gamma thawed 1 -10 10 pl1.ref frozen 1 -3.40282e+38 3.40282e+38 pl1.ampl thawed 6.4442e-06 6.4442e-09 0.0064442
The guess command makes an initial guess at parameter values to ensure convergence, but it is always a good idea to check that the initial range of values (soft limits) is sensible for the data being fit.
We have elected to call guess after setting the data range (i.e. the ignore call) to ensure only the selected range is used. For this example it does not matter the order of the two calls, but it can for other model types.
Fitting the Data
In order to fit both data sets simultaneously, fit() is called with both IDs (it can also be called with no arguments to fit all data sets defined in the session):
sherpa> fit(1, 2) Datasets = 1, 2 Method = levmar Statistic = chi2gehrels Initial fit statistic = 28.2208 Final fit statistic = 5.7398 at function evaluation 51 Data points = 14 Degrees of freedom = 11 Probability [Q-value] = 0.890149 Reduced statistic = 0.5218 Change in statistic = 22.481 abs1.nH 1.16556 +/- 0.540921 pl1.gamma 2.2429 +/- 0.839149 pl1.ampl 4.32308e-05 +/- 4.02775e-05
The calc_stat_info command (see also get_stat_info) may be used to access goodness-of-fit statistics for each individual data set included in the simultaneous fit, plus the simultaneous fit, without having to re-run the fit.
sherpa> calc_stat_info() Dataset = 1 Statistic = chi2gehrels Fit statistic value = 3.63839 Data points = 7 Degrees of freedom = 4 Probability [Q-value] = 0.457151 Reduced statistic = 0.909597 Dataset = 2 Statistic = chi2gehrels Fit statistic value = 2.10141 Data points = 7 Degrees of freedom = 4 Probability [Q-value] = 0.717113 Reduced statistic = 0.525353 Datasets = [1, 2] Statistic = chi2gehrels Fit statistic value = 5.7398 Data points = 14 Degrees of freedom = 11 Probability [Q-value] = 0.890149 Reduced statistic = 0.5218
Both fits can be plotted simultaneously, as shown in Figure 2, using the generic plot command or plot_fit, and saved to file with the matplotlib plt.savefig function:
sherpa> plot("fit", 1, "fit", 2) sherpa> plt.savefig("two_fits.ps")
Figure 2: Two spectra, fit with same model
The two models appear similar, so we can compare them with the plot_model function (Figure 3).
sherpa> plot_model(1, alpha=0.5) sherpa> plot_model(2, alpha=0.5, overplot=True)
Figure 3: The model fits
To see the model expression before it is modified by the instrument response we can use the plot_source function. In this case as both datasets use the same model the same plot would be created—except for the title—if we had used dataset 2 in the following:
sherpa> plot_source(1, xlog=True, ylog=True)
Figure 4: The source model
Link Parameters and Fit Again
If the second spectrum is similar, but not identical to the first spectrum, a different model component could be used in one of the source definitions. Additionally, parameter linking can be used to fix parameter values to each other.
For example, if the intensity of the source is expected to change while the power-law slope does not, we could define a new power-law component and link the slopes together. The result is another free parameter in the fit: the normalization of the second power-law component.
sherpa> set_source(2, abs1 * powlaw1d.pl2) sherpa> guess(pl2) sherpa> pl2.gamma = pl1.gamma
Now fit the data again:
sherpa> fit(1, 2) Datasets = 1, 2 Method = levmar Statistic = chi2gehrels Initial fit statistic = 1.64966e+10 Final fit statistic = 5.73685 at function evaluation 31 Data points = 14 Degrees of freedom = 10 Probability [Q-value] = 0.836866 Reduced statistic = 0.573685 Change in statistic = 1.64966e+10 abs1.nH 1.16272 +/- 0.540229 pl1.gamma 2.23967 +/- 0.838073 pl1.ampl 4.27621e-05 +/- 4.03077e-05 pl2.ampl 4.33551e-05 +/- 4.05536e-05
Only the amplitude of the new component (pl2.ampl) is fit. In this case, the amplitudes of the two power-laws are nearly identical. The final model parameter values may be printed:
sherpa> show_model() Model: 1 apply_rmf(apply_arf((11619.081430486 * (xsphabs.abs1 * powlaw1d.pl1)))) Param Type Value Min Max Units ----- ---- ----- --- --- ----- abs1.nH thawed 1.16272 0 100000 10^22 atoms / cm^2 pl1.gamma thawed 2.23967 -10 10 pl1.ref frozen 1 -3.40282e+38 3.40282e+38 pl1.ampl thawed 4.27621e-05 6.4442e-09 0.0064442 Model: 2 apply_rmf(apply_arf((11619.081410727 * (xsphabs.abs1 * powlaw1d.pl2)))) Param Type Value Min Max Units ----- ---- ----- --- --- ----- abs1.nH thawed 1.16272 0 100000 10^22 atoms / cm^2 pl2.gamma linked 2.23967 expr: pl1.gamma pl2.ref frozen 1 -3.40282e+38 3.40282e+38 pl2.ampl thawed 4.33551e-05 0 3.40282e+38
This thread is complete, so we can exit the Sherpa session:
sherpa> quit()
Scripting It
The file fit.py is a Python script which performs the primary commands used above; it can be executed by typing %run -i fit.py on the Sherpa command line.
The Sherpa script command may be used to save everything typed on the command line in a Sherpa session:
sherpa> script(filename="sherpa.log", clobber=False)
(Note that restoring a Sherpa session from such a file could be problematic since it may include syntax errors, unwanted fitting trials, et cetera.)
History
14 Nov 2007 | rewritten for CIAO 4.0 Beta 3 |
09 Dec 2008 | figures moved inline with text |
11 Dec 2008 | updated for Sherpa 4.1 |
16 Feb 2009 | example of guess functionality added |
29 Apr 2009 | new script command is available with CIAO 4.1.2 |
17 Dec 2009 | updated for CIAO 4.2 |
19 Mar 2010 | photoelectric absorption model xswabs replaced with xsphabs |
13 Jul 2010 | updated for CIAO 4.2 Sherpa v2: removal of S-Lang version of thread. |
15 Dec 2010 | updated for CIAO 4.3: calc_stat_info is available for accessing goodness-of-fit statistics for each individual data set included in a simultaneous fit |
15 Dec 2011 | added an additional option for simultaneously plotting fits of two different data sets, using plot_fit(); reviewed for CIAO 4.4 (no changes) |
03 Dec 2013 | reviewed for CIAO 4.6: no changes |
30 Jan 2015 | updated for CIAO 4.7: no content change |
02 Dec 2015 | updated for CIAO 4.8: cleaned up description on using guess. |
08 Nov 2016 | reviewed for CIAO 4.9, no content change. |
12 Apr 2018 | reviewed for CIAO 4.10, no content change. |
06 Dec 2018 | reviewed for CIAO 4.11, screen output updated. |
13 Dec 2019 | reviewed for CIAO 4.12, fits revised, saving figure changed from print_window with the equivalent Matplotlib command plt.savefig. |
17 Dec 2020 | reviewed for CIAO 4.13: plots updated to the new scheme, the ignore step has been moved before the call to guess, and more plots have been added. |
07 Mar 2022 | reviewed for CIAO 4.14, no content change. |
05 Dec 2022 | reviewed for CIAO 4.15, screen output updated; typos fixed. |